Combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake tailored microsurgical resection to respect functional neural networks: preliminary experience.

INTRODUCTION: The combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake surgery is a tailored microsurgical resection to respect functional neural networks (mainly the language and motor ones). Intraoperative MRI has been classically considered to increase the extent of resection for gliomas, thereby reducing neurological deficits. Herein, we evaluated the combined technique of awake microsurgical resection and intraoperative MRI for primary brain tumours (gliomas, metastasis) and epilepsy (cortical dysplasia, non-lesional, cavernomas). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients were treated with the commonly used "asleep awake asleep" (AAA) approach at Lille University Hospital, France, from November 2016 until May 2020. The exact anatomical location was insular with various extensions, frontal, temporal or fronto-temporal in 8 (44.4%), parietal in 3 (16.7%), fronto-opercular in 4 (22.2%), Rolandic in two (11.1%), and the supplementary motor area (SMA) in one (5.6%). RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 38.4 years (median 37.1, range 20.8-66.9). The mean surgical duration was 4.1 hours (median 4.2, range 2.6-6.4) with a mean duration of intraoperative MRI of 28.8 minutes (median 25, range 13-55). Overall, 61% (11/18) of patients underwent further resection, while 39% had no additional resection after intraoperative MRI. The mean preoperative and postoperative tumour volumes of the primary brain tumours were 34.7 cc (median 10.7, range 0.534-130.25) and 3.5 cc (median 0.5, range 0-17.4), respectively. Moreover, the proportion of the initially resected tumour volume at the time of intraoperative MRI (expressed as 100% from preoperative volume) and the final resected tumour volume were statistically significant (p= 0.01, Mann-Whitney test). The tumour remnants were commonly found posterior (5/9) or anterior (2/9) insular and in proximity with the motor strip (1/9) or language areas (e.g. Broca, 1/9). Further resection was not required in seven patients because there were no remnants (3/7), cortical stimulation approaching eloquent areas (3/7) and non-lesional epilepsy (1/7). The mean overall follow-up period was 15.8 months (median 12, range 3-36). CONCLUSION: The intraoperative MRI and awake microsurgical resection approach is feasible with extensive planning and multidisciplinary collaboration, as these methods are complementary and synergic rather than competitive to improve patient oncological outcomes and quality of life.

How to combine the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and awake craniotomy for microsurgical resection of hemorrhagic cavernous malformation in eloquent area: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cavernous malformations are clusters of abnormal and hyalinized capillaries without interfering brain tissue. Here, we present a cavernous malformation operated under awake conditions, due to location, in an eloquent area and using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging due to patient's movement upon the awake phase. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the pre-, per-, and postoperative course of an inferior parietal cavernous malformation, located in eloquent area, in a 27-year-old right-handed Caucasian male, presenting with intralesional hemorrhage and epilepsy. Preoperative diffusion tensor imaging has shown the cavernous malformation at the interface between the arcuate fasciculus and the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. We describe the microsurgical approach, combining preoperative diffusion tensor imaging, neuronavigation, awake microsurgical resection, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSION: Complete microsurgical en bloc resection has been performed and is feasible even in eloquent locations. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging was considered an important adjunct, particularly used in this case as the patient moved during the "awake" phase of the surgery and thus neuronavigation was not accurate anymore. Postoperative course was marked by a unique, generalized seizure without any adverse event. Immediate and 3 months postoperative magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the absence of any residue. Pre- and postoperative neuropsychological exams were unremarkable.

Microsurgical resection of fronto-temporo-insular gliomas in the non-dominant hemisphere, under general anesthesia using adjunct intraoperative MRI and no cortical and subcortical mapping: a series of 20 consecutive patients.

Fronto-temporo-insular (FTI) gliomas continue to represent a surgical challenge despite numerous technical advances. Some authors advocate for surgery in awake condition even for non-dominant hemisphere FTI, due to risk of sociocognitive impairment. Here, we report outcomes in a series of patients operated using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IoMRI) guided surgery under general anesthesia, using no cortical or subcortical mapping. We evaluated the extent of resection, functional and neuropsychological outcomes after IoMRI guided surgery under general anesthesia of FTI gliomas located in the non-dominant hemisphere. Twenty patients underwent FTI glioma resection using IoMRI in asleep condition. Seventeen tumors were de novo, three were recurrences. Tumor WHO grades were II:12, III:4, IV:4. Patients were evaluated before and after microsurgical resection, clinically, neuropsychologically (i.e., social cognition) and by volumetric MR measures (T1G+ for enhancing tumors, FLAIR for non-enhancing). Fourteen (70%) patients benefited from a second IoMRI. The median age was 33.5 years (range 24-56). Seizure was the inaugural symptom in 71% of patients. The median preoperative volume was 64.5 cm3 (min 9.9, max 211). Fourteen (70%) patients underwent two IoMRI. The final median EOR was 92% (range 69-100). The median postoperative residual tumor volume (RTV) was 4.3 cm3 (range 0-38.2). A vast majority of residual tumors were located in the posterior part of the insula. Early postoperative clinical events (during hospital stay) were three transient left hemiparesis (which lasted less than 48 h) and one prolonged left brachio-facial hemiparesis. Sixty percent of patients were free of any symptom at discharge. The median Karnofsky Performance Score was of 90 both at discharge and at 3 months. No significant neuropsychological impairment was reported, excepting empathy distinction in less than 40% of patients. After surgery, 45% of patients could go back to work. In our experience and using IoMRI as an adjunct, microsurgical resection of non-dominant FTI gliomas under general anesthesia is safe. Final median EOR was 92%, with a vast majority of residual tumors located in the posterior insular part. Patients experienced minor neurological and neuropsychological morbidity. Moreover, neuropsychological evaluation reported a high preservation of sociocognitive abilities. Solely empathy seemed to be impaired in some patients.

Impact of combined use of intraoperative MRI and awake microsurgical resection on patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Microsurgical resection of primary brain tumors located within or near eloquent areas is challenging. Primary aim is to preserve neurological function, while maximizing the extent of resection (EOR), to optimize long-term neurooncological outcomes and quality of life. Here, we review the combined integration of awake craniotomy and intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) for primary brain tumors, due to their multiple challenges. A systematic review of the literature was performed, in accordance with the Prisma guidelines. Were included 13 series and a total number of 527 patients, who underwent 541 surgeries. We paid particular attention to operative time, rate of intraoperative seizures, rate of initial complete resection at the time of first IoMRI, the final complete gross total resection (GTR, complete radiological resection rates), and the immediate and definitive postoperative neurological complications. The mean duration of surgery was 6.3 h (median 7.05, range 3.8-7.9). The intraoperative seizure rate was 3.7% (range 1.4-6; I^2 = 0%, P heterogeneity = 0.569, standard error = 0.012, p = 0.002). The intraoperative complete resection rate at the time of first IoMRI was 35.2% (range 25.7-44.7; I^2 = 66.73%, P heterogeneity = 0.004, standard error = 0.048, p < 0.001). The rate of patients who underwent supplementary resection after one or several IoMRI was 46% (range 39.8-52.2; I^2 = 8.49%, P heterogeneity = 0.364, standard error = 0.032, p < 0.001). The GTR rate at discharge was 56.3% (range 47.5-65.1; I^2 = 60.19%, P heterogeneity = 0.01, standard error = 0.045, p < 0.001). The rate of immediate postoperative complications was 27.4% (range 15.2-39.6; I^2 = 92.62%, P heterogeneity < 0.001, standard error = 0.062, p < 0.001). The rate of permanent postoperative complications was 4.1% (range 1.3-6.9; I^2 = 38.52%, P heterogeneity = 0.123, standard error = 0.014, p = 0.004). Combined use of awake craniotomy and IoMRI can help in maximizing brain tumor resection in selected patients. The technical obstacles to doing so are not severe and can be managed by experienced neurosurgery and anesthesiology teams. The benefits of bringing these technologies to bear on patients with brain tumors in or near language areas are obvious. The lack of equipoise on this topic by experienced practitioners will make it difficult to do a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. In the opinion of the authors, such a trial would be unnecessary and would deprive some patients of the benefits of the best available methods for their tumor resections.